{"id":1078,"date":"2023-07-21T16:35:46","date_gmt":"2023-07-21T23:35:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/?p=1078"},"modified":"2023-07-21T16:35:46","modified_gmt":"2023-07-21T23:35:46","slug":"selina-meyer-and-richard-nixon-a-nixonian-character-analysis-of-veep-by-porter-reyes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/selina-meyer-and-richard-nixon-a-nixonian-character-analysis-of-veep-by-porter-reyes\/","title":{"rendered":"Selina Meyer and Richard Nixon &#8211; A Nixonian Character Analysis of Veep by Porter Reyes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many political insiders hail HBO\u2019s hit television show <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> as the most accurate television show about American politics.<\/span> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep\u2019s<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> protagonist, Selina Meyer, starts in season one as the Vice President of the United States \u2014 a position that never satisfied her. After being promoted to commander in chief following the former President\u2019s resignation, she goes on to lose the following presidential election but regains the presidency in the final episode.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Meyer\u2019s political journey mirrors that of another former vice president turned commander in chief: Richard M. Nixon. Throughout the series, despite differences between their superficial characteristics like their upbringing and sex, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> includes a surprising amount of Nixonian overtones, parallels, and allusions that suggest an intense similarity between Meyer and Nixon.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The strongest evidence supporting Meyer\u2019s resemblance to Nixon is that she attributes the impetus for her desire to become President to her experience at Nixon\u2019s inaugural ball. In season five, episode nine, Meyer\u2019s daughter Catherine interviews her for a documentary. Catherine asks Meyer when she first knew that she wanted to be President, to which Meyer responds: \u201cIt was 1973\u2026 Daddy asked me to be his date for President Nixon\u2019s inaugural ball\u2026 Daddy leaned into me and he said, \u2018You know, a lot of people don\u2019t like Nixon, but by God, they respect him. And that\u2019s you, peanut.\u2019\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Thus, Meyer\u2019s father telling her that she, like Nixon, may be disliked by many but will earn respect is what prompted Meyer to run for President. Meyer smiles after telling this story, but then her grin fades, and she looks off to the side, conveying sad contemplation. Perhaps in this moment, Meyer comes to understand that her political success cost her dearly. Like Nixon, Meyer is a ruthless political operator \u2014 she did whatever it took to win the presidency, even breaking the law. While this path led to success, it resulted in her being remembered unfavorably by the public, a fate Nixon shared. Furthermore, Meyer\u2019s connection to Nixon is subsequently strengthened when she proclaims in the next scene that \u201cI don\u2019t want to jinx things, guys, but I think maybe we should start making our list of who I\u2019m going to punish when I win [this election].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Considering that the show explicitly mentioned Nixon shortly before Meyer says this and that Nixon was known for his vindictiveness, this statement is likely a Nixonian allusion.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> includes many more instances in which Meyer\u2019s character and political career are likened to Nixon\u2019s, the most obvious of which relates to the infamous Watergate scandal. In season five, episode six, a scandal \u2014 dubbed \u201cC**tgate\u201d \u2014 emerges in which the media reports that one of Meyer\u2019s staffers called her a \u201cc**t.\u201d Furious, Meyer demands that her staffer Amy launch an investigation. When it does not yield timely results, she fires members of the communications department. During a discussion about this decision, Amy exclaims that \u201cShe\u2019s becoming seriously unhinged. She has gone full-metal Nixon.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This phrase indicates that Meyer was exhibiting Nixonian behavior with full force. In particular, Amy is likely referring to Nixon\u2019s desire for absolute loyalty from White House staff.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Thus, in addition to \u201cC**tgate\u201d referencing Watergate, the show explicitly states that Meyer resembles Nixon once again.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another more subtle Nixonian allusion occurs in the ninth episode of season four. During a congressional hearing on the topic of alleged misconduct by the Meyer administration, the President\u2019s personal secretary Sue reveals the existence of incriminating voice memos sent via iPhone. The way this political scandal emerged is similar to how the White House tapes were revealed to the public. Alexander Butterfield, who served as Nixon\u2019s deputy assistant, was the first to tell Americans about the White House tapes.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> While Sue and Butterfield do not share the exact same role, they are similar in their status as relatively obscure staffers. Yet, both had information that had the potential to bring down the President. Thus, this plot line in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> likely serves as a twenty-first century version of the scandal surrounding the White House tapes, which furthers Meyer\u2019s connection to Nixon.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Veep <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">includes many more situations in which Meyer\u2019s behavior and political career resemble Nixon\u2019s. For example, in episode eight of season three, Meyer experiences a visually problematic eye twitch during a debate. This mirrors the challenge Nixon faced during his first debate against JFK, in which Nixon looked uncomfortable because of his knee injury.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Additionally, like Nixon, Meyer committed election interference to secure the presidency by working with a foreign government.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> But isolated examples such as these are not where the similarities stop: Meyer also possesses key Nixonian qualities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of Nixon\u2019s characteristics that Meyer embodies is described best by historian Joan Hoff. Hoff describes Nixon using a term he coined: \u201caprincipled.\u201d In his book <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nixon Reconsidered<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Hoff explains the distinction between an aprincipled and unprincipled person:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">An unprincipled person is one who consciously lacks moral scruples and is presumably\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">aware that standards are being violated. In contrast, the aprincipled person, seldom\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">reforms his behavior or expresses remorse for transgressions against societal norms\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">because there is no conscious admission of wrongdoing \u2014 no apparent awareness of\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">conventional moral or ethical standards.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> (Hoff 3)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Meyer displays this attribute throughout the series and exemplifies it toward the end when she betrays her daughter to win the presidency. At this point in the show, Catherine has told her mother she is dating a woman. Yet, when choosing between gaining a governor\u2019s support that would ensure her political survival and banning same-sex marriage, Meyer does not hesitate to make the politically expedient choice: \u201cIn exchange for your support, I will raw-dog a plank right up our party\u2019s platform, and I will outlaw same-sex marriage.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Notably, Meyer mentions this position goes against her party\u2019s platform. Like Meyer, Nixon had no problem betraying his party\u2019s ideology if it was a politically wise decision, which left conservatives feeling betrayed.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> As Hoff observes, as an aprincipled person, Nixon did not view his tendency to go against his party\u2019s domestic policies \u2014 which ostensibly reflected his ideology \u2014 as immoral. Rather, Nixon\u2019s ideological flexibility was a cornerstone of his political strategy.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> When Catherine angrily confronts her mother for agreeing to overturn same-sex marriage, Meyer demonstrates a lack of remorse and infidelity to her party\u2019s ideology: \u201cCan you believe I\u2019m having to deal with this right now? \u2026 It is just the party platform. It\u2019s like a to-do list of things we\u2019re not gonna do.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This interaction shows that Meyer is aprincipled, which is a key Nixonian quality.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nixon\u2019s refusal to conform his policy proposals to conservative ideology exemplifies one of his political strategies known as \u201ctriangulation,\u201d which Meyer also uses. The term was coined by political commentator Dick Morris, who explained that triangulation means \u201c[taking] the best from each party\u2019s agenda, and [coming] to a solution somewhere above the positions of each party.\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Meyer demonstrates triangulation in the second episode of season three when she contemplates her stance on a cutoff date for women seeking abortions: \u201cWe [just can\u2019t go] over 40\u2026 I can\u2019t stick to 24 weeks now because that\u2019s gonna make me the most liberal \u2026 [compared to my opponents].\u201d<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Here, Meyer uses triangulation by trying to find a middle ground between a liberal and conservative abortion policy. This instance shows that Meyer bases her domestic policy on political considerations rather than personal convictions \u2014 a well-known Nixonian tendency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">While Meyer gained the power and influence she desired, like Nixon, she left a terrible legacy. Although Nixon had significantly more achievements than Meyer, he is nonetheless remembered similarly by many Americans as corrupt and unsuccessful. Nixon and Meyer\u2019s story should cause Machiavellian political thinkers to reconsider a critical question: do the ends <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">always<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> justify the means?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many political insiders hail HBO\u2019s hit television show Veep as the most accurate television show about American politics. Veep\u2019s protagonist, Selina Meyer, starts in season &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":35,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,55],"tags":[75],"class_list":["post-1078","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-non-fiction","category-volume-22-spring-2023","tag-porter-reyes"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/35"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1078"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1078\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/community.scrippscollege.edu\/scrippsjournal\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}